The campaign against blacklisting will not go away

The campaign against blacklisting will not go away

by John Millington

The image of union activist George Tapp lying on a Manchester road with two broken legs and blood pouring from his head following a vicious hit and run during an anti-blacklist demonstration on Wednesday evening has shocked many.

According to eye witnesses, Mr Tapp – a 64 old electrician and anti-blacklist campaigner was dragged on to a car bonnet for over 100 metres before being flung to the ground by a car driver, angry at having the road temporally blocked by protesters.

Those who witnessed the crime were electricians and militant trade unionists, hardy sorts and stoic types, not easily moved to emotion.

Yet many who spoke to me in the aftermath were on the verge of tears as they described the incident.

One recalled it being like “slow motion” describing the driver as abusive and pushing his car against Mr Tapp before punching the car into full throttle propelling the 64 year old and two colleagues on to the bonnet.

Further anger has been caused by statements made by Chief Supt Russ Jackson claiming that CCTV footage showed the protesters climbing on to
the car bonnet.

Four witnesses have come forward to tell me that this did not take place and it was the force of the car itself that pushed Mr Tapp on to the bonnet before the car sped away.

The Chief Supt. also suggested the car drove away “slowly” which considering Mr Tapp’s injuries seems highly dubious as does the claim that a 64 year old climbed on a car bonnet in the first place.

Whatever the truth about the events of that day, the statement shows at best a distinct lack of sympathy on behalf of senior officers within the Greater Manchester Police for Mr Tapp’s appalling ordeal and at worst represents an attempt to distract attention from the issue and thus aid construction firms in hoping that it will all just go away.

A Blacklist Support Group spokesman was incredulous at the suggestion that Mr Tapp or any other protester should be the focus of an investigation and said: “The only criminal offence on the day was the assault with a deadly weapon by the car driver who seriously injured George Tapp.”

“Protesting is not against the law. Blacklisting and GBH both are. The police should spend their time arresting the real criminals the car driver and the blacklisting firms.”

And Salford TUC – a body representing thousands of trade unionists in the area, who have been supporting Mr Tapp while he is in hospital said in a statement that he was “shocked and dismayed by the initial comments made by the police, which chose to focus on those carrying out a peaceful protest, rather than the actions of a driver who it seriously injured a 64 year old man and then fled the scene.”

Mr Tapp will now seek legal advice from his union Unite.

Covering this dispute and other construction related issues as I have for 3 years, I have had the opportunity to witness firsthand the behaviour of protesters.

These are not rioters causing trouble for its own sake or students being a little too overzealous.

They are working people, with families to feed and jobs to do, which they are often denied through the practice of blacklisting.

Where as every one of us, including journalists have had to contend with a failing job market, many of these skilled workers have an extra barrier of being cut out of jobs because of their trade union activity.

And what does this trade union activity consist of in the main?

Electrician and young trade unionist Jason Poulter from Accrington said to me once that his “militancy” stretched as far as “asking for hot water” on his building site and separate a eating area for the workforce so they did not ingest dangerous chemicals.

The blacklisting scandal has been brought to the attention of the media in parliamentary committees where former business chiefs who had dealings with the Consulting Association – a body that kept thousands of names of worker s on a file, have been grilled by MP’s.

But what has had almost no national newspaper coverage, are the protests by the electricians themselves.

There are major demonstrations in every part of the country and internationally every week.
Campaigners employ the tactics of peaceful civil disobedience, outside the Crossrail project in London, construction company awards in Scotland, various sites in Wales and even as far afield as the Netherlands.

Their message is simple: that work is a human right.

People like Steve Acheson and others – highly skilled people who have helped construct the Channel tunnel have been denied long term work in the industry they love and are trained for, for over a decade.

And Frank Morris who was sacked along with 27 others is going to Employment Tribunal next week after a 7 month campaign to get his job back on the Crossrail project.

The jobs are there. They either get done poorly by less skilled people or employers exploit labourers from abroad – all in the name of cost cutting.

With the internet, an economic slowdown and rogue employers all thrown into the mix, blacklisting is thought by many to be a continuing practice today.

Denying blacklisted and highly skilled workers the right to contribute to society will only hinder the economic recovery further and bring more pain and misery to many more thousands of families.

Their voice deserves a larger audience than is being granted them at the moment.

Trade union justice campaigners join forces in London

Trade union justice campaigners join forces in Londonpic: London Spark

 

Union activists blocking a main road near Westminister today to highlight their respective campaigns for justice.

Anti-blacklist campaigners and Unite members blocked the road alongside activists highlighting the the RMT Justice for 33 campaign.

The action takes place following the hit and run of Unite member George Tapp who was taking part in a road blockade in Manchester on Wednesday night.

For more information on both campaigns:

http://www.rmtlondoncalling.org.uk/trainpeople

http://www.hazards.org/blacklistblog/

EXCLUSIVE: Blacklisted worker needs re- constructive surgery after being victim of hit and run in Manchester.

EXCLUSIVE: Blacklisted worker needs re- constructive surgery after being victim of hit and run in Manchester.   pic: A. Smith

By John Millington

An elderly worker who was run over last night during a demonstration about the contentious blacklisting issue will need re- constructive surgery due to his injuries.

George Tapp (pictured following the collision) – 64 and a blacklisted worker was dragged 150 yards after being hit by an angry motorist who sped away following the incident.

He has two broken legs and a fractured knee cap which requires re-constructive surgery.

Eye witnesses claim that Mr Tapp was peacefully protesting along with others when a car drove out from a queue and rolled up to the demonstration.

The driver – thought to be in his 20’s – hurled abusive language at Mr Tapp and two others before pushing his car against them.

Before they had chance to move, the driver put his car into full throttle, sweeping Mr Tapp and two others of their feet dragging them on to the car’s bonnet.

Mr Tapp and one other were dragged for around 150 yards before the car came to a stop leaving Mr Tapp bloodied and prone on the ground.

The driver sped off following the incident.

It is understood that the driver registration has been handed to the Greater Manchester Police.

Chief Supt Russ Jackson told the Manchester Evening News that CCTV showed the man and that he appeared to be standing on the front of a car bonnet when the car moved.

“A number of people stood in front of the Ford Ka and climbed upon the bonnet before it moved forward. The car then travelled a short distance at a slow speed before it stopped and one of the men fell off. The car reversed and drove off.

“We are working to ascertain whether any criminal offence has occurred and I would ask the driver of the car or anyone who witnessed the incident to contact police.

Officers are now in the process of talking to representatives of Unite Union and BAM Construction to establish what happened last night.”

“While we respect the democratic right of anyone holding a peaceful protest, if we believe individuals have behaved in an unlawful manner, we will take action.”

But fellow demonstrators were left unimpressed by the police statement saying that Mr Tapp had clearly been the victim of a hit run and in no way brought it on himself.

Electrician Kevin Holmes who saw the incident said:

“The car pulled out of the queue and the driver started shouting “move out the fucking way” to George and two others.

“They were being pushed back by the car and had no chance to get out of the way.”

“Suddenly he [the driver] hit full throttle and the force pushed George onto the bonnet and the driver didn’t stop for at least 150 yards.”

“In no way was it George’s fault. Yes we were blocking the road but no one has the right to run some down when they are protesting about jobs.”

Mr Holmes who has attended similar protests in the past says drivers are normally “happy” to chat about the issues that they are protesting about.

“There is a lot of anger amongst rank and file workers. We know this was nothing to do with BAM construction but the determination as strong as ever,” added Mr Holmes.

Fellow demonstrator and eye witness Jason Poulter also said the “force of the momentum pushed George up on to the car.”

“A lot of people are angry and wondering why a 64 year old is getting run over in order to safe guard a national agreement,” he added.

And a 3rd eye witness Sean Keaveney said the whole incident had made him “sick to his stomach.”

“It was like slow motion,” the blacklisted electrician said. 

“It was a peaceful protest and was a total over-reaftion from the driver.  He was intent on running people out of the way.”

“George is 64 – he was not ‘standing on the bonnet.’ He was run over.”

“But we have to carry on. I am blacklisted. We have to bring it to the attention of the public.”

“All I just want to find a job.”

The protest which was organised by the Blacklist Support Group (BSG)  was held near Manchester City FC over alleged blacklisting by BAM construction – a charge BAM bosses strongly deny.

UPDATED: Anti-blacklist campaigner run over at demonstration in Manchester needs “re-constructive surgery”

Anti-blacklist campaigner run over at demonstration in Manchester

By John Millington

64 year old blacklist campaigner George Tapp was ploughed down and dragged 100 yards along a road at a demo outside Manchester City FC yesterday.

Friends and supporters have reported that he has 2 broken legs and a fractured knee cap.

And it has just been confirmed that he needs “re-constructive surgery” following the collision.

2 other blacklisted workers joining Mr Tapp on the peaceful demonstration were also hit by the same car.
A spokesman for the Blacklist Support Group which has campaigned to expose blacklisting companies within the construction industry said in a statement on social media:

“George is a blacklist hero who has been campaigning with fellow blacklisted worker Steve Acheson for many years.”

“He recently attended the Blacklist Support Group AGM and led a delegation of blacklisted workers who encouraged the Mayor of Salford to ban blacklisting firms from publicly funded contracts.”

“We wish him a speed recovery.”

No more information about the car or who was responsible is currently available.

The incident is likely to inflame tensions and galvanise support for the campaign which is being led by the Unite and GMB trade unions.

Chief Supt Russ Jackson told the Manchester Evening News that CCTV showed the man and that he appeared to be standing on the front of a car bonnet when the car moved.

He said: “From what we can see from CCTV, protesters were blocking Ashton New Road, preventing motorists from going any further.

“A number of people stood in front of the Ford Ka and climbed upon the bonnet before it moved forward. The car then travelled a short distance at a slow speed before it stopped and one of the men fell off. The car reversed and drove off.

“We are working to ascertain whether any criminal offence has occurred and I would ask the driver of the car or anyone who witnessed the incident to contact police. Officers are now in the process of talking to representatives of Unite Union and BAM Construction to establish what happened last night.”

“While we respect the democratic right of anyone holding a peaceful protest, if we believe individuals have behaved in an unlawful manner, we will take action.”

NUJ condemns latest death threat against NI journalists

The National Union of Journalists has condemned a death threat issued by loyalist paramilitaries against two Northern Ireland based journalists.

The names of the journalists are not being released at this time.

Michelle Stanistreet, NUJ general secretary said: “A free press is a hallmark of a democratic society and anyone making threats against journalists for carrying out their work attempts to undermine democracy as well as press freedom. Threats against journalists from any quarter must stop.”

Barry McCall, NUJ president said: “Threats such as these cannot be tolerated. Journalists in Northern Ireland have a proud record of refusing to be intimidated by such threats but they should not be subject to them in the first place. The NUJ calls on those responsible for the threats to withdraw them immediately and to issue a public statement to that effect.”

Bob Miller, NEC member and Belfast branch chair said: “The naked threat of violence by paramilitaries, whatever their background, against members of this union is to be deplored. We ask those responsible for issuing threats against journalists working in Northern Ireland to withdraw them immediately and we call on their public representatives to issue a statement to that effect.”

  • Source NUJ press office

World Federation of Trade Unions – May Magazine edition OUT NOW!

Click here for the May edition of the WFTU monthly magazine: http://www.wftucentral.org/wp-content/flashes-may-2013.pdf

The International Trade Union Conference of the WFTU under the slogan”Economic immigrants: We demand full social security, labour and trade union rights, dignified salaries” concluded yesterday in the European Parliament in Brussels, Belgium.

50 trade unionists from 23 countries participated in this important event.

With great success, vital deliberations for the exchange of experience and proposals for the organizing of the work of the trade unions about the problems of the migrant workers, Implementing the resolutions of the Presidential Council Meeting in Peru, 7-8 March 2013 as well as the direction of the 2nd Panafrican Meeting in Sudan on 4-6 February 2013, the WFTU held this vital International Trade Union Conference to bring together trade unions from countries with high immigration flow and trade unions from receiving countries to assist in the coordination of their common struggles for the interests of the migrant workers around the world and especially in Europe.

Amongst many topics discussed, the plight of migrant workers was high on the agenda.

20130514_090733.jpgThe key intervention was held by comrade Giannis Tasioulas, President of the Construction Workers Federation of Greece and member of the Executive Commitee of PAME, who undelined that: “Today, the number of immigrants globally has reached 214 million, i.e. 3.1 % of the global population. Almost half of them are women (49%). At the same time, the number of refugees has reached 15.4 million, while the displaced people have reached 27.5 million. These populations did not abandon their countries out of choice, but because of their need to work. For this reason, the majority of them have as their place of destination the most developed capitalist economies: 50 million live in North America (USA and Canada), 72 million in Europe” and concluded amongst others that: “The WFTU struggles in the spirit of internationalist solidarity for the unity of the working people regardless of their colour, race, gender, nationality, origin, religion. We give priority to the struggle against xenophobia, racism, discrimination, exclusion, against all fascist theories. We are trying to ensure that the immigrants will actively participate in the trade union movement with equal rights and that they will be elected to the organs. Every class-oriented trade union organization must have a committee of immigrants that will deal with their specific needs regarding their work, the legal framework and their other social or culture.

REVIEW: Star Trek – Into Darkness

By John Millington

Explosions without any awe, fear of death without tension and the final frontier without imagination.

Star Trek: Into Darkness should rank as the year’s biggest disappointment given the gaping void between expectation and delivery.

Box office figures will no doubt show that STID to be a success.

Director JJ Abrams has in a calculated manner ticked all the boxes to ensure financial reward and showcased what he can do to reboot the Star Wars franchise.

The studio will be happy, the actors increased profile will lead to more lucrative contracts and theatre goers will have had their 15 pounds worth of high octane 3D bang bang bang to last them till the end of their extra large popcorn box.

STID like many modern big money films are calculated projects designed to deliver maximum return on investment.

In the blitz of special FX that the audience is subjected to, any notion of art or film guile is not even an after thought.

It is just not present.

Judging the film purely for what it is, a money maker profiting from the name of a franchise which at least at some point in its life still nodded towards being artistic, it has flaws.

When terrorist John Harrison (Cumberbatch) attacks Starfleet HQ and kills Kirk’s (Pine) father figure Captain Pike, who in there right mind would send Kirk into hunt down and kill the one responsible?

I mean this is supposed to be a semi military operation mirroring the violent aspects of the US and the peacekeeping nature of the UN.

As Spock (Quinto) would say, it is not logical.

We find out later that it is just so the Enterprise can be in the right place to fit the story line that sets up a final battle with the Admiral (Weller) and allows Khan to take the admiral’s ship, go to earth and fight Spock on the final showdown.

The other annoying thing about STID is the stupidity with which Abrams  treats the audience.

Spock and Kirk are counter posed as logic vs heart.

Yet anyone above the age of 10 knows that people are more nuanced and not as obviously two dimensional.

In fact this was reflected in the other Star Treks where Kirk and Spock did disagree but Kirk on occasion does make logical command choices which make sense.

Nothing about what Kirk does in STID makes sense. He does not give the impression of someone who manages a shopping department store let alone an intergalactic space vessel.

He displays no gravitas and his constant objections to Spock are akin to those of a petulant child who is not allowed to do what he wants.

And taking into account his puerile and sleazy attitude toward women characters, it is a wonder he hasn’t been stripped of his command for sexual harassment.

This brings me on to the depiction of women and alien characters in the film.

The Klingons are only shown very briefly with their leader clearly fitting the stereotype of a 6’6 black man who then sets about “savagely” trying to knife the comms officer Uhura (Saldana)

In another scene where Kirk Spock and Uhura are risking death and having to pilot a space craft through some tight spots, Uhura – a supposedly professional, language expert with great poise under pressure, begins talking about the problems of her personal relationship with Spock in front of the Captain and how it is affecting her.

Really?!! Is this the time? Perhaps it is about reminding us that emotional women should not be put in front-line positions of responsibility because they just can’t hack it.

But by far the worst misogynistic offence is committed against Carol Marcus (Eve).

She is supposed to be the love interest for Kirk, a weapons specialist and again – an experienced Starfleet officer who is the daughter of the rogue admiral.

There is no sexual or emotional tension between Kirk and Marcus.

The only moment where it is attempted is in the most contrived scene I have seen where Kirk catches a glimpse of her getting undressed. Her objection is to produce a model pose as if in a photo shoot just so the camera can capture her for the tralier reel.

There is no depth to her character or hard evidence of her expertise.

A scene where she “showcases” her knowledge consists of a last minute panic where she pulls out a circuit which stops a torpedo going off.

But again this is all ok because we have ticked the box that she has a brain so now we are at liberty to showcase her real assets in underwear for the purposes of titillation.

The one saving grace is the baddie John Harrison (Cumberbatch).

He can clearly act and when he first appears, there is a sense that he presents a real and menacing threat.

However his performance is a simply his Sherlock role but on steroids.

Even with his all his power and intelligence you never get the sense he presents a real danger to the Enterprise or to Kirk.

There are plenty of other ethical dilemmas over how people treat enemies and worryingly at the end the dispatching of the bad guys in a concealed crate sent off into deep space reminds you of Guantanamo Bay.

Taking a look back at Star Trek: Wrath of Khan and the lovely dark 80′s sets and model ships with real sweat and a deep sense that space is this cold lonely place, STID is pure popcorn company for a bored 12 year old at best.

I never escaped into the world that Abrams attempted to create. Halfway through,  I lost interest in what would happen to the characters.

Good sci-fi should make you contemplate the big questions of the universe, of your existence and swell your imagination.

STID gives you a headache and makes you long for an earlier more sophisticated time.

As I exited the cinema, I felt alienated and old. I felt as if I had been repeatedly beaten over the head by a mass marketing campaign masquerading as art.

Maybe I am getting older. I do long for a time when I pretended I could explore space, be brave and have unshakable morals in taking on the bad guys.

Maybe this bypassed Abrams growing up because all he has done since rebooting Star Trek is cook us a starter to tease us in his first Trek outing, produced a dreadful tasteless unmemorable main course and is just hoping we will stick around for dessert while he is busy rustling up his starter for the Star Wars crowd.

Check please!

Star Trek: Into Darkness (as a film) 2 out of 5 

Star Trek: Into Darkness (as a ST film) 1 out of 5